|
1
No Submission
0.00% |
2
Unsatisfactory
75.00% |
3
Less Than Satisfactory
80.00% |
4
Satisfactory
88.00% |
5
Good
92.00% |
6
Excellent
100.00% |
70.0 %Content |
|
15.0 %Introduction to EBP Project Selected from a Peer-Reviewed Nursing Journal |
None |
Introduction is absent from summary. |
Introduction is vague, and does not fully describe the evidence-based project presented in the article. |
Introduction is brief, but fully describes the evidence-based practice project presented in the article. |
Introduction gives a clear and complete description of the evidence-based practice project presented in the article. |
Introduction is thorough and explicitly describes the evidence-based practice project presented in the article. |
20.0 %Summary of Key Points of EBP Project |
None |
Summary is absent. |
Summary is brief, and insufficiently addresses the key components of the article. |
Summary is concise, and partially addresses most of the key components of the article. |
Summary is comprehensive and completely addresses most of the key points of the article. |
Summary is comprehensive and completely addresses each of the key points of the article. |
10.0 %List of Steps taken by Nursing to start and implement the EBP |
None |
List of steps is absent. |
List of steps is incomplete. |
List of steps is complete, but lacks clear details and organization. |
List of steps is complete and well-organized, but lacks clear details. |
List of steps is complete, detailed, and well-organized. |
25.0 %Application of the information learned from EBP. |
None |
Application of learned information is absent. |
Application of EBP is described, but is an inappropriate match. |
EBP is applied to an appropriate example, but effectiveness is inadequately supported. |
EBP is applied to an appropriate example. Support and justification for effectiveness is explained. |
EBP is successfully applied to an appropriate example. Support and justification for effectiveness is clearly outlined. |
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness |
|
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose |
None |
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. |
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
8.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions |
None |
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. |
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. |
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. |
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. |
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. |
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
None |
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. |
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register); sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. |
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. |
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. |
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
10.0 %Format |
|
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
None |
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
All format elements are correct. |
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) |
None |
No reference page is included. No citations are used. |
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. |
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. |
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct. |
In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. |
100 %Total Weightage |