Opioid Epidemic in FloridaAssignment 1: Discussion AssignmentThe discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing relevant topics

Opioid Epidemic in Florida

Assignment 1: Discussion Assignment

The discussion assignment provides a forum for discussing relevant topics for this week on the basis of the course competencies covered.

For this assignment, post your initial response to the Submissions Area for the week one project by the due date assigned 

To support your work, use your course and text readings and also use the South University Online Library. As in all assignments, cite your sources in your work and provide references for the citations in APA format.

Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your classmates as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ initial postings. Participate in the discussion by asking a question, providing a statement of clarification, providing a point of view with a rationale, challenging an aspect of the discussion, or indicating a relationship between two or more lines of reasoning in the discussion. Cite sources in your responses to other classmates. Complete your participation for this assignment by the end of the week.

Scholarly Project Progress

Provide the chosen title for your scholarly project, along with your thesis statement and PICOT question. Provide an overview of your topic and background information. Describe the importance of the project to nursing practice. Build a case for the need for the project.

Assignment 2: Develop the PICOT Question

Develop your PICOT question and define the specific information about your DNP project. Submit your work to the Dropbox for review and feedback from your instructor.

Submission Details:

• Name your document SU_NSG8100_W3_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.
• Submit your documents to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.
• On a separate page, cite all sources using APA format within 5 YEARS

Use the criteria below in addition to your directives for this assignment.

Assignment 2 Grading Criteria

Maximum Points

The population is evidence-based, well developed, and in the appropriate PICOT format.

5

The intervention is evidence-based, well developed, and in the appropriate PICOT format.

5

The comparison is evidence-based, well developed, and in the appropriate PICOT format.

5

The outcome is evidence-based, well developed, and in the appropriate PICOT format.

5

The timing is evidence-based (if applicable), well developed, and in the appropriate PICOT format.

10

Total:

30

Assignment 3: Literature Review: Five Articles Abstracted onto the Evaluation Table

THIS WILL BE PLACED IN THE WEEK 3 MIDWEEK ASSIGNMENT DROP BOX SECTION along with the Assignment 2

In Weeks 2–7, you will submit an evaluation table document with five research articles abstracted for your literature review (refer to W3 Working Ahead). Although it is expected that a majority of the articles will be part of your final literature review, some may not necessarily be included depending on your evaluation. For example, out of the thirty articles you evaluate during this course, you may only end up including twenty in your final review. The total number of articles you include may also depend on the amount of existing research. Try to shoot for twenty to twenty-five articles as a target for your final review. You will organize the information obtained from the review by paraphrasing and organizing concepts, variables, themes, and data from each article according to the nine headings in the evaluation table.

**Click here to download a blank evaluation table. These will be provided for you…this is only a reminder …..

**Click here to view a sample evaluation table that contains the required data. These will be provided for you…this is only a reminder …..

Submission Details:

• Save the table as SU_NSG8100_W2_A3_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.
•  Submit your documents to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.

Use the criteria below in addition to your directives for this assignment.

Assignment 3 Grading Criteria

Maximum Points

The evaluation table contains five new appropriate articles with each table heading having a comprehensive abstraction or justification about why the section is not applicable.

20

Used correct spelling, grammar, and professional vocabulary. Cited all sources using APA format.

5

Total:

25

*****************************************************************************