CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Project (EBP)

CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Project (EBP)

Follow the instructions provided in CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Project (EBP). Utilize the Synthesis Table, Table of Evidence and EBA Project Evaluation Tool to complete your CLC assignment. Submit these documents in Topic 5 as the CLC assignment. APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected. You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin. Synthesis Table Example Name of Article Name of Article Name of Article Name of Article Levels of Evidence Study Design Variable to be studied Variable to be studied Variable to be studied Compare template above to my table below. At a glance you can see the names of the most important articles I choose, the level of evidence of that study, what the design was, and what variables were important to know about in each article. As you study the table, the reader can clearly see more studies in support of BiPAP than IS along with other information that would be of interest to the provider to support standards of care. Table 2 Synthesis of IS and NIPPV Evidence /Types of Surgery Follow the instructions provided in Critique of Research Studies Instructions. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin. Critique of Research Studies Instructions Directions: Complete a critique of the quantitative and qualitative articles that were submitted in Module 3. This assignment will be completed in three parts. Refer to the information below as a guide to the information that should be included in each part. Follow the guidelines for the quantitative and qualitative article critiques in Chapter 5, Box 5.2, pages 112-114 and Box 5.3, pages 115-117 of the textbook. 1) Utilize a central heading to indicate that what follows is the critique of the articles. 2) The side headings of the critique for each article should follow the headings in Box 5.2 and 5.3. 3) Note that within these BASIC guidelines, there are additional references to Detailed Critiquing Guidelines found in various boxes in chapters focused on the various elements of a research study report. Use these to expand the research study and to learn specific terminology appropriate to the critique of research. When turning in the final submission, please put in the the following order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources). Critique of Research Studies – Part 1: Due Module 4 For Part 1 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article: Quantitative Qualitative · Title · Title · Abstract · Abstract · Introduction · Introduction o Statement of the problem o Statement of the problem o Hypotheses or research questions o Research questions o Literature review o Literature review o Conceptual/theoretical framework o Conceptual underpinnings Critique of Research Studies – Part 2: Due Module 6 For Part 2 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article: Quantitative Qualitative · Method · Method o Protection of human rights o Protection of participants’ rights o Research design o Research design and research tradition o Population and sample o Sample and setting o Data collection and measurement o Data collection o Procedures o Procedures o Enhancement of trustworthiness Critique of Research Studies – Part 3: Due Module 8 For Part 3 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article: Quantitative Qualitative · Results · Results o Data analysis o Data analysis o Findings o Findings · Discussion o Theoretical integrations o Interpretation of findings · Discussion o Implications/recommendations o Interpretation of the findings · Global Issues o Implications/recommendations o Presentation · Global Issues o Researcher credibility o Presentation o Summary assessment o Researcher credibility o Summary assessment week 5 This is a CLC assignment. Follow the instructions provided in CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Project (EBP). Utilize the Synthesis Table, Table of Evidence and EBA Project Evaluation Tool to complete your CLC assignment. Submit these documents for this weeks CLC assignment. While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin. Synthesis Table Example Name of Article Name of Article Name of Article Name of Article Levels of Evidence Study Design Variable to be studied Variable to be studied Variable to be studied Compare template above to my table below. At a glance you can see the names of the most important articles I choose, the level of evidence of that study, what the design was, and what variables were important to know about in each article. As you study the table, the reader can clearly see more studies in support of BiPAP than IS along with other information that would be of interest to the provider to support standards of care. Table 2 Synthesis of IS and NIPPV Evidence /Types of Surgery week 6 Follow the instructions provided in Critique of Research Studies Instructions. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin Critique of Research Studies Instructions Directions: Complete a critique of the quantitative and qualitative articles that were submitted in Topic 3. This assignment will be completed in three parts. Refer to the information below as a guide to the information that should be included in each part. Follow the guidelines for the quantitative and qualitative article critiques in Chapter 5, Box 5.2, pages 112-114 and Box 5.3, pages 115-117 of the textbook or the Research Critique Additional Template Resource. 1) Utilize a central heading to indicate that what follows is the critique of the articles. 2) The side headings of the critique for each article should follow the headings in Box 5.2 and 5.3. 3) Note that within these BASIC guidelines, there are additional references to Detailed Critiquing Guidelines found in various boxes in chapters focused on the various elements of a research study report. Use these to expand the research study and to learn specific terminology appropriate to the critique of research. When turning in the final submission, please put in thefollowing order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources)

Need Help Writing an Essay?

Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your paper. Our Essay writing service covers over 243 courses and programs, catering to your specific needs.

Write My Essay For Me!

Can You Do My Homework for Me?

YES, ⚡ Experience the brilliance of our essay writers from the US, UK, Canada, or Australia by entrusting us with your next essay.

NursingEssayHub.com is a distinguished ONLINE ESSAY WRITING AGENCY that specializes in offering expert writing help and assistance to students across all academic levels. With a team of highly skilled writers and editors boasting years of academic writing experience, we are fully equipped to guide you throughout the entire process, from selecting the perfect topic for your paper to completing a thorough literature review and delivering a well-formatted final draft.


BEST-ESSAY-WRITERS-ONLINE

ORDER A SIMILAR ESSAY WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH at : https://nursingessayhub.com/

PLACE YOUR ORDER

SHARE WITH A FRIEND